Relief for Rishi Sunak as Rwanda bill passes first vote in Commons | Immigration and asylum

Rishi Sunak narrowly avoided a major rebellion by rightwing Conservative MPs after they abstained on his controversial Rwanda bill but the prime minister faces further peril in the new year.

In a blow to Sunak’s authority, more than two-dozen Tory rightwingers abstained in the vote on deporting asylum seekers to Rwanda, including the former home secretary Suella Braverman.

MPs warned that the prime minister must strengthen the legislation or face it being voted down when it returns to the Commons in early January.

Sunak now faces weeks of chaos as he struggles to hold together his mutinous party, with the rightwing openly attacking his flagship bill, while centrist One Nation MPs have warned they would be unable to support a toughened-up version.

Furious loyalist ministers warned that the rebels could push the government to the brink of collapse, with Sunak’s leadership already fragile and the Labour leader, Keir Starmer, demanding an immediate general election if the Rwanda bill falls.

However, Downing Street will take some comfort from the fact that not a single Conservative MP voted against the bill – while the number of abstentions was significantly lower than the 100 claimed by the so-called “five families” on the party’s right.

One Tory rebel source said: “This bill has been allowed to live another day. But without amendments it will be killed next month. It’s now up to the government to decide what it wants to do.”

It would require 29 Tory MPs to vote against the bill to defeat it entirely.

Immediately after the vote – which passed 313 votes to 269, with a majority of 44 – Sunak tweeted: “The British people should decide who gets to come to this country – not criminal gangs or foreign courts. That’s what this bill delivers. We will now work to make it law so that we can get flights going to Rwanda and stop the boats.”

After the vote, the shadow home secretary, Yvette Cooper, said: “The Conservatives’ civil war is continuing, and the country is paying the price for this chaos. Today’s debate shows how weak Rishi Sunak is with this Tory psychodrama now dragging on into the New Year.”

In a dramatic day at Westminster, Sunak spent hours trying to convince Tory MPs not to block the bill, sparing him a humiliating defeat. He held a series of meetings with different factions, starting with a pre-dawn breakfast at No 10.

But as hardliners on the Tory right pushed for measures to block interference from foreign courts, the home secretary, James Cleverly, who is said to have previously described the plan as “batshit”, suggested the legislation was already close to the limits of what would be possible.

In the Commons, Cleverly said: “The actions that we are taking, whilst novel, whilst very much pushing at the edge of the envelope, are within the framework of international law.”

Ahead of the vote, the new immigration minister, Michael Tomlinson, said that stopping all legal appeals against deportation by people who arrive in the UK through irregular means would not be “the British thing to do”, as he confirmed the government would not pull the vote.

Tory rightwing rebels warned Sunak that “major surgery” was still required to fix the asylum legislation, suggesting that Sunak has agreed to “tighten” the bill and that they could vote against it if the government refused to act on their concerns.

In a last-minute press conference before the vote, Mark Francois, chair of the European Research Group of MPs, said: “We very much hope that at committee those amendments may yet be accepted. If they are not and the bill remains amended in that way, again, collectively we agreed to reserve the right to vote against it at third reading.”

Robert Jenrick, who quit as immigration minister over the plans, used his Commons speech to push for stricter curbs on an individual’s ability to legally challenge their removal and for the government to overrule European court of human rights injunctions. He told MPs: “This bill could be so much better. Let’s make it better.”

Miriam Cates, from the New Conservatives group of MPs, said: “We agree that the bill is defective as it is. We don’t believe it will stop the boats. There are too many opportunities for legal challenge. We do support the principle of the bill, which is to stop the boats.”

The One Nation group, numbering about 100 MPs, backed the bill but has warned it will resist any amendments from the right that would risk the UK breaching the rule of law and its international obligations.

The parliamentary battle came after it emerged that a man seeking asylum is believed to have killed himself while being housed on the Bibby Stockholm barge, which was leased by Braverman to house recent arrivals to the UK.

Sunak has put the Rwanda bill at the heart of his policy to stop people crossing the Channel in small boats, which was one of five key priorities he set out at the start of the year.

The legislation is designed to overcome concerns raised by the supreme court, which ruled last month that the policy in its previous form violated domestic and international law.

The bill would empower ministers to ignore temporary injunctions raised by the European court of human rights that can stop flights taking off at the last minute.

But it does not set aside the European convention on human rights entirely, and would allow people to launch legal appeals to argue that they should be spared deportation because of particular circumstances.