With no sign of any movement from the government on the ban on citizenship for those who have arrived in the UK without permission, despite further pressure, it looks like it will end up being lawyers who hopefully get this policy overturned. We have also started to hear directly from those who have been affected by this insidious change. The Home Office position continues to be vague about “mitigating circumstances” allowing applications to be granted, with no acknowledgement of the fact that without a clear indication of whether an application will be successful or not, people will simply not be prepared to risk the extortionate application fee.
Further, the “mitigating circumstances” mentioned in the Home Office’s response to that article is very different to the “exceptional, compelling and mitigating” circumstances referred to by a Home Office minister in the House of Lords. If the minister misspoke then a correction should be made.
There were reports last week that we may finally see some movement from the UK government on a youth mobility scheme for EU workers. It was reported that quotas will apply, which is to be expected as that is also the case for the other countries that participate in the scheme. It will be interesting to see whether demand reaches the applicable quota as, for example, demand from Australia has been only a fraction of the number of places actually available.
On Free Movement, for those of you currently contemplating yet another grey day in the UK and dreaming of escape, I highly recommend reading Alex Piletska’s very well-researched and entertaining piece on the immigration implications of housesitting. She is of course looking at the position for those who come to the UK, but the issues raised seem likely to apply to housesitting elsewhere in the world.
There were a few case write ups on the blog last week, including this costs decision written up by James Packer, highlighting the difficulties faced by litigants in person trying to navigate complex procedural rules. I updated our explainer on the “no recourse to public funds” restriction to take into account some recent changes. Also on that subject, I flagged up this report looking at the Home Office’s increasing practice of asking for more evidence in change of conditions applications, much of which seems to be a complete waste of everyone’s time and adding to the growing casework delays in this area.4
Finally, a quick mention that the Stand Up! Speak Out! series of free, online training to resist the Hostile Environment in public services is back for 2025. As ever there is a really impressive line up covering legal aid, healthcare, housing, local authority care, use of interpreters and much much more.
For everything else on Free Movement and elsewhere, read on.