Friday morning saw yet another avoidable tragedy as four people died while trying to cross the Channel to reach the UK. While the Prime Minister has sensibly declined to commit to “stopping the boats” (they will not stopped but can be reduced), the government’s focus on criminal gangs rather than providing people with an alternative to attempting this dangerous journey means that further deaths seem inevitable.
The Guardian has reported that the new government is evaluating existing routes before creating any new ones. The reality is that there is very little to evaluate, as my recent update to our safe and legal routes post shows. A small step that could usefully and quickly be taken now is to publish updated and lawful guidance on biometric enrolment that addresses all of the concerns that have been raised.
In other news, the Home Office has apparently had a “technical fault” that has led to it mistakenly telling people that their asylum claims had been successful, with grant letters and biometric residence permits apparently being issued. These were then later retracted with people being instructed to destroy and return their long awaited permits. It is unclear how many people have been affected, and the other incidents mentioned in the article seem separate to this as no grant letters were issued.
There were some interesting developments last week in the Diego Garcia litigation, which we have covered previously as the United States has withdrawn consent for lawyers and journalists to go to the island for the hearing. The hearing was cancelled as a result and the lawyers have written to the Foreign Secretary asking him to intervene.